E85 Biofuel Myth or Magic? You Decide

e85_logo.jpgE85 has been classified as an alternate fuel by the US Department of Energy to be used in your Flex Fuel Vehicle. Flex Fuel Vehicles (FFV) can run on normal gasoline or E85 Ethanol. E85 is the name designated for fuel that is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline and you may also hear it referred to as biofuel. It can be produced from many sources but mainly corn, potatoes, barley, and byproducts from the production of paper and food. Any one of these products can be distilled or fermented into a non-consumable alcohol called ethanol.

field2.jpgProponents of E85 state that it’s an excellent performing fuel that burns cleaner than gasoline and supports our very own domestic economy. In addition it’s a completely renewable source of energy for your vehicle, all things this country needs at this time. Sounds pretty good, but let us not forget that there are two sides to every story. Opponents would argue that the amount of land needed to produce more sugar/starch/cellulose would be much greater than we use for those products today hence causing many other environmental problems such as soil erosion and water pollution. Also, since crops are being used for fuel it may drive prices up for our food. Some interesting arguments here but are they correct?

graph1.jpgThe pros.

We are looking at lessening our dependence on foreign oil by using ethanol. There are base sources all over the world that could be made available for the production of E85. At this time in the U.S., we use more than half the oil we import for our cars. There would be CO2 emissions (amounts still up for debate) during producing and consuming ethanol. During production those emitted gases could be reused in the growing of more crops as a nutrient. The amount of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere while using biofuel would be equal to the amount that plants consume to grow and produce ethanol. When introduced into water ethanol degrades at a quick pace, which in the event of an accident, such as a spill, would eliminate the hazard to the environment much faster than a similar spill with gasoline or oil. The amount of damage and cost of cleanup from a catastrophic spill of Valdez caliber would be far less than we have grown accustomed to in the past. You might read that due to production equipment to harvest and create ethanol that the emissions from that equipment outweigh the “green” effect of ethanol. A study by UC Berkeley states that even after all involved with production ethanol nets a “positive net energy balance”. We can also consider the option of biofuels going full circle. With the implementation of E85, the equipment used to harvest and produce biofuels could themselves be powered by biofuels. After an adjustment period the whole process from harvesting to burning ethanol would become much greener than what is in place now for the production of gasoline, from welling to processing. This source of energy for automobiles would be renewable, meaning after you harvest a field of corn to prepare and produce ethanol you could replant the same field to create more ethanol, the polar opposite to drying out an existing oil field.

field1.jpgThe cons.

We must remember supply and demand. If we can use our farm land to create fuel for our cars, available farm land would disappear quickly and we would experience environmental issues such as erosion from growing crops. Currently we have regulations on what fertilizers and hormones can be used to grow the crops we eat, but will the same regulations be in place if they aren’t being ingested by the consumer? The problem is that great amounts these chemicals would be harmful to our environment by polluting our air and water. I’m sure we all remember some of the pesticide/herbicide scares we have had in previous years. Now let’s consider what your average farmer would think, what will make more money for him/her? What would be in higher demand, crops for food or crops for fuel? If it’s fuel then what would happen to our food prices? Would they go through the roof if a farmer could make more money producing fuel? The possibility is that food prices for farm grown products could raise drastically. Now we are faced with looking at being able to efficiently use ethanol. Ethanol can’t be stored or pumped the same way gasoline is. So in order to make it available to the general public your local service stations would have to install new tanks and pumps. The cost of this would be astronomical, and likely take many years to fully integrate. Remember what happened to electric vehicle charging stations? I rarely saw them even at the height of the craze when the technology was making a big push, and before you know it, hybrids took over.

map1.jpgIn conclusion it really doesn’t matter how you slice it there are some good arguments on both sides concerning the production and use of ethanol/E85/biofuel to power the vehicles we drive every day. As far as I’m concerned people are dedicating themselves one way or the other to quickly to the implementation and use of biofuel. The idea is still up to much study, debate, and research to be able to decide whether E85 will prove advantageous or not. The future holds the answer, but the correct answer is still undetermined.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • Slashdot
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Comments not related to the article or offer no value to the discussion will be removed.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

10 Responses to “E85 Biofuel Myth or Magic? You Decide”

  1. fthefarmer Says:

    Liked your story about the ills of Ethanol, it is indeed releiving to see the press finally getting it that Ethanol is nothing but a lobbyists dream and a taxpayer nightmare but there is another player hoping that ethanol survival the big three. GM ’s sudden stewardship of the environment is simply a way to continue to make gas guzzlers thanks to E85 an extremely inefficient fuel. The CAFE standards call for all car companies to acheive an average MPG for all vehicles. I believe the most recent number is 33 MPG. Well if you make the biggest money off of 10 miles per gallon SUV’s you would hate to say good bye to them wouldn’t you?
    The CAFE standards has a loophole, that being that an E85 vehicle operating on E85 miles per gallon are ONLY figured against the actual amount of gasoline in the blend (15%) if you divide 100% fuel by 15% gasoline you get the multipler to the mpg (666) therefore a gas guzzling 10 MPG SUV is given credit for 66.6 MPG. If you sell one SUV like this you can have 3 vehicles only acheiving 24 MPG and this gas guzzling SUV and you average more than 34 MPG overall.
    GM is not the only one taking advantage of this free ride Ford and Chrysler are too. The big three are heading down the toilet and this is just their hands clinging to the rim.

  2. Ron Pitman Says:

    That does seem like a huge loop hole. What is to stop these automakers from just making all of their vehicles compatible with E85? This would completely undermine the CAFE standard…

  3. it takes more fuel to make Ethanol than you would be saving.
    It’s like paying $2 for $1.

  4. Food prices are already going through the roof. What everyone fails to see is that in poorer countries this will cause starvation. Here we just pay a little more and grumble. Bio fuels will destroy lives in poor countries by using our food growing resources for fuel instead.

  5. E85 won’t work. It’s a band-aid for a much larger problem. On top of that E85 is not available anywhere and where you can find it, it’s almost the same price at gas.

    So why bother? People are not going to seek it out unless there’s a savings.

  6. Yes agreed, the correct answer is still undetermined

  7. I agree that the answer is still undetermined. However I also believe that this is a huge step in the right direction. If E85 can efficiently power cars with 85 percent less gasoline they I’d say we’ve come pretty far. As for the cost being so high, that would decrease dramatically and the demand increase exploded.

  8. As with any technology you need to balance the pros and cons. You can make a compelling argument on either side. One of the biggest limiting factors I see on widespread adoption is our fueling infrastructure. Can we expect all gas stations across the country to start supplying E85 at their pumps? This would be very expensive for them.

    On the flip side I think biofuel combined with hybrid technology could potentially be a great way to rid the USA’s dependence on foreign oil. If I remember right the Chevy Volt that will be coming out in 2010 is a plug-in hybrid that can use E85.

  9. Yes that correct. I think that the pros in this instance definitely out way the cons. Now Im not saying that this is the best and only option, but if there is an option to reduce our oil dependancy and pollution by 85% then why not. If there could ever be a better time to stop these dependancies I would like to know when?

  10. [...] E85 Biofuel Myth or Magic? You Decide - the answer is not determined (tags: info,environment) [...]

Leave a Reply